Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Matteo Polleri, “From Adversity to Heresy: Towards a Disjunctive Conjunction of Foucault and Marx.” Genealogy+Critique 11, no. 1 (2025): 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.16995/gc.23083

Open access

Abstract
Over the last decades, influential critical thinkers have creatively mobilized Foucault’s ideas to renovate the Marxist lens. However, while recognizing key proximities between Marx’s and Foucault’s works, Étienne Balibar has argued that these attempts necessarily face fundamental obstacles. In his view, the “point of heresy” connecting Marx’s and Foucault’s thought must be understood as a fundamental “adversity.” By critically discussing Balibar’s argument, this article shows that a “conjunctive”, rather than “adversative,” interpretation of the “point of heresy” might be used to develop a cross-reading of Marx and Foucault. The article thus poses methodological reflections for a systematic reassessment of the Marx-Foucault relationship.

Keywords:
Marx, Foucault, Balibar, Marxism, heresy

Monica Greco, Biopolitics. In Eds. Arpad Szakolczai and Paul OʼConnor, Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Anthropology, Elgar, 356–359
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035310494.00075

Abstract
While Michel Foucault was not the first to use the term ‘biopolitics’, his formulation of this concept transformed its meaning fundamentally for subsequent generations of scholars. Through this concept, Foucault turned the tables on a tradition of research that would seek in ‘nature’, and specifically in organic life, the foundational matrix for political life. Instead, he inaugurated a rich seam of research into the processes through which ‘life’ came to be constituted as a political problem and as an object of governance. The theme of biopolitics was initially developed in the context of a genealogy of the modern state but remains relevant in a broader context of governance characterised by liberal and neoliberal modes of thought and operation. The relationship between biopolitics and ‘life’ itself is one of dynamic tension. If biopower can be imagined as a form of the exercise of power that seeks to capture, define, and channel the powers of living beings, the vitality of such beings lies precisely in the extent to which their creativity always exceeds and escapes definitive capture.

Diana Stypinska and Andrea Rossi, (2025). Pastoral Power: Perspectives on the Present. Theory, Culture & Society, Online 26 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251397525

Open access

Abstract
This introduction to this special section of Theory, Culture & Society focuses on the formation of power that Michel Foucault – in a number of texts and lectures from the late 1970s and early 1980s – analyzed under the label of ‘the pastorate’. Stressing the ongoing socio-political relevance of pastoral power, the article outlines some of the ways in which it continues to directly influence and animate an array of secular governmental techniques in manners that other critical paradigms can only partially account for. In this, it takes as its focal point two interrelated problematiques: (1) the relation between truth and subjectivity as a constitutive element of modern power relations and (2) the theological subtexts of modern governmentality – demonstrating how they are elaborated upon by the articles comprising the special section.

Tim Christiaens, Joost de Bloois, Stijn De Cauwer, An Introduction to Contemporary Italian Thought. From Posthumanism to Cyberfascism, Bloomsbury, 2025

Description
Over the past three decades, Italian thought has emerged as a major field within continental philosophy. But what are the latest developments since Italian theory rose to a peak of popularity in the 2000s? This book offers an accessible and incisive introduction to contemporary Italian thought, revealing above all its continued relevance to some of the most pressing political, social and ethical conflicts today.

Broadening the idea of Italian thought beyond biopolitics, An Introduction to Contemporary Italian Thought engages with a number of leading and upcoming philosophers, including Silvia Federici, Rosi Braidotti, Donatella di Cesare, Emanuele Coccia, Sandro Mezzadra, Franco ‘Bifo’ Berardi and Federico Luisetti. It demonstrates how Italian theory resonates in a wide variety of current debates, from digital technology, pandemics and populism to cyberfascism, environmentalism and decolonization. This not only uncovers the fruitfulness of Italian philosophy but further allows for fresh perspectives on debates dominated by well-trodden and often dated arguments. In consideration of populism, for instance, this book does not so much examine Donald Trump but rather turns to Silvio Berlusconi and Giorgia Meloni, just as its discussions of the digitization of work look beyond Silicon Valley to working conditions in EU and Global South from the perspective of Italian (post)workerism, and the Anthropocene is considered in light of radical zoological egalitarianism as it emerges in contemporary Italian thought.

Tackling head-on the complex and porous notion of what constitutes ‘Italian thought’, Christiaens, De Bloois and De Cauwer bring new understanding to contemporary Italian theory and, with it, novel perspectives on current critical issues.

Tim Christiaens is Assistant Professor of economic ethics at Tilburg University, the Netherlands. He is the author of Digital Working Lives (2022) on the gig economy and worker autonomy, and has published on topics like Italian thought, philosophy of technology, neoliberalism, and biopolitical theory in journals like European Journal of Social Theory, Italian Studies, Big Data & Society, and Foucault Studies.

Joost de Bloois is Senior Lecturer of Cultural and Literary Analysis at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. His publications include Politics of Withdrawal (with Pepita Hesselberth), a special issues of Rethinking Marxism on Italian post-workerism (with Monica Jansen and Frans-Willem Korsten), essays on Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito and Erri de Luca, as well as a monograph on the work of Alain Badiou and several co-authored handbooks in cultural studies.

Stijn De Cauwer is Assistant Professor at the Leiden University Centre for the Arts in Society, the Netherlands. His publications include Critical Theory at a Crossroads: Conversations on Resistance in Times of Crisis (2018), Critical Image Operations: The Work of Georges Didi-Huberman (2019), and writings on topics such as visual studies, cultural theory, German literature (including a monograph on the work of Robert Musil), Italian philosophy and biopolitics.

Carlo Alessandro Castellanelli, Constanza Parra, Artur da Rosa Pires, The politics of possibility in just transitions: A Foucauldian reading, Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 129, 2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104375

Abstract
Drawing from Michel Foucault’s notions of power, knowledge, governmentality, and biopolitics, we explore the epistemological and ontological foundations of just transition discourses. Current hegemonic conceptualizations of just transitions, though generally accepted as noble endeavours, risk reproducing power structures that prioritize specific socio-technical pathways and knowledge regimes, making them ill-equipped for radical imaginations of alternative futures. Our analysis reveals how dominant just transition narratives may subtly function as disciplinary mechanisms that govern populations by constraining possibilities to market-oriented and technocratic solutions, reinforcing individual responsibility, neglecting systemic critiques, and marginalizing radical alternatives. This framing not only limits the scope of social transformation but also shapes the very subjects, objects and forms of life it aims to liberate. In doing so, it reinforces the same power structures it seeks to dismantle. Responding to this challenge, we argue that fostering (r)evolutionary practices across different contexts requires critically examining how discourses shape realities and constrain possibilities. By deconstructing the politics of possibility of just transitions in the Anthropocene, we hope to contribute to a granular (and reflexive) understanding of this evolving paradigm – one that challenges epistemological closures within sustainability discourse and remains attentive to different ontologies, epistemologies, and lived experiences.

Keywords
Foucault; Just transitions; Sustainability transitions; Power; Governmentality; Biopolitics

With all my very best wishes for the Festive Season and the New Year from Foucault News.

Michel Foucault poster for sale on Etsy by Eatmyshirtzshop

Georgios Tsagdis, Anthropocene Anarchives, Deleuze and Guattari Studies, Volume 19, Issue 4
https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2025.0620

Abstract
The essay pursues Deleuze’s reading of Foucault in order to elicit a fourfold of anarchival virtualities that trouble and destabilise the constitution of every archive. This thematisation of the anarchival is critical in an age that orders life relentlessly, arranging and controlling its every aspect and principally its material-informational conditions as a biological phenomenon. The essay thus affords a new understanding of the Anthropocene as the age of bioarchives. Through a close examination of plant archives such as the Svalbard Global Seed Vault and animal archives, such as the Frozen Ark, the essay explicates the speculative logic that governs the discursive statements of bioarchives as well as limits of their aspirations. At the intersection of power, knowledge and memory, Deleuze’s reading of Foucault accordingly enables not only a critical engagement with the way the present attempts to preserve past life in order to govern its future but opens a space to imagine a future anarchive of life.

Phillip Joy, Meredith Bessey, and Linda Mann “I Believe in Santa Claus” and Ozempic: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Holiday Health Advertising. Qualitative Health Research. First published online June 19, 2025
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251350876

Open access

Abstract
This study examines the weight-related discourses in holiday advertising for Ozempic, a prescription drug originally developed for diabetes management but now widely marketed for weight loss. Sponsored Facebook advertisements for Ozempic were collected throughout December 2024, with 12 ads analyzed through Foucauldian discourse analysis. This analysis identifies three interrelated discursive constructs: (1) Santa Takes Ozempic, (2) Ozempic as the Perfect Holiday Gift, and (3) Medical Authority Meets Holiday Cheer. These advertisements use cultural symbols like Santa Claus and New Year’s resolutions messaging to (re)produce dominant and contested discourses about fatness and weight loss, while constructing pharmaceutical intervention as both a necessity and a gift. The analysis highlights how these marketing strategies mobilize biopower, construct self-surveillance as normative, and contribute to the commodification of health, reinforcing weight stigma under the guise of holiday celebration.

Huseyin Caliskan, Ustuner Birben & Sezgin Ozden, Shifting Priorities: How Amendments in Forestry Law Impact Resource Management, the Case of Türkiye. Environmental Management 76, 13 (2026).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02308-w

Abstract
In Türkiye, where nearly all forests are publicly owned, the government exercises substantial authority over forest management and utilization. This study examines how legislative and regulatory changes in forestry have shaped local outcomes, focusing on the tension between economic priorities and ecological sustainability. Methodologically, the study combines Hamilton’s institutional approach, highlighting the role of legal frameworks, administrative routines, and authority structures in shaping governance, with Foucault’s concept of governmentality, which emphasizes how power is exercised through norms, regulations, and technical knowledge. This dual framework is applied through a qualitative document analysis of forestry laws, development plans, and policy papers. The findings show that while official statistics suggest an overall expansion of forest area, regional patterns reveal increasing pressures on natural forests to supply industrial raw materials, and growing reliance on non-forestry permits within forest boundaries. These outcomes demonstrate that governance mechanisms and legislative amendments have systematically prioritized economic utilization. The study concludes that the Turkish case illustrates how institutionalized governance choices, mediated through law and regulation, may simultaneously enable resource mobilization and accelerate long-term forest degradation. These insights emphasize the need for policy frameworks that better balance economic development with ecological preservation, offering lessons for sustainable forest governance globally.

Call for Papers
Conference: Contagion, Information, Territory

Date: 17-19 June, 2026
Location: Leiden University, The Netherlands

Keynote speakers
Dr. Ramon Amaro (Design Academy Eindhoven)
Prof. Dr. Jasbir Puar (University of British Columbia)

Deadline Call for Papers: 31 January, 2026

PDF of call for papers

As new forms of exclusion and colonialism are emerging and old apartheid policies reinvigorated, the movement of people, the spread of disease, and the circulation of information become ever more central to our understanding of war, politics, identity, and government. The war in Gaza and illegal occupation in the West Bank are a case in point. This conflict is not just territorial, it is informational, and the Israeli government employs strategies of withholding care and barring humanitarian aid to preemptively immunize Israel’s cultural and legal selfperception as a ‘uniquely’ Jewish nation-state, against Palestinian life. As the international movement of trans* and queer people is restricted in ways that bring to mind the late 20th century response to the HIV/AIDS crisis, gender and sex education are thought of as ‘infecting’ children with particular sexual preferences, or encouraging trans* identification in them. Meanwhile, the language of contagion is activated politically and by opposing factions. Where some speak of a “woke mind virus,” others attempt to make sense of fascist protests like the January 6th attack on the Capitol in 2020, or the 2025 extreme rightwing riots in The Hague, the Netherlands, as fueled by viral online discourse and contagious hatred of immigrants.

In response to these concerns, contagion, information, and territory emerge as central concepts of political analysis and critical thought. Contemporary artists and writers like Isadora Neves Marques, Tabita Rezaire, Michel Nieva, and Anne Boyer reflect on these convergences in their practice, and academic consideration of such work may help theorize them further. It is for this reason that we call for papers that seek to map the connections between contagion, information, and territory through critical analyses of cultural objects.

How do public health interventions, immunization policies, and biopolitical regimes help govern populations under conditions of uncertainty? Concepts of (auto-)immunity, and parasitism, have been central to discussions around biomedicine, territory, and democracy, and considerations of care, the viral, and vaccination have found new urgency during the COVID-19 pandemic (Cohen 2009; Esposito 2008; Serres 1982; Derrida 2004; Di Cesare 2021; Povinelli 2016). Angela Mitropoulos helps us wonder how insurance, contracts, and riskprediction have historically structured vulnerability and precarity along lines of gender, race, and capital (Mitropoulos 2012). Jasbir Puar has mobilized the notion of “debility” to critically examine discourses around a variety of crises, urging us to focus on the endemic nature of state sanctioned “debilitation” as part of biopolitical regimes of power and in the context of Palestinian rights (Puar 2017).

For this conference, we are particularly interested in scholarship that brings these concerns into dialogue with contemporary technological and political realities (Pasquinelli 2023; Amoore 2013; Parisi 2013). How do data infrastructures and algorithmic systems (re)produce social hierarchies and how do they relate to what Ramon Amaro refers to as “the black technical object” (Amaro 2023)? How can bio- and necropolitical configurations around human embodiment, along with their relationship to disease, harm, and contagion, be theorized in connection to processes of territoriality and critical analyses of datafication in this “technolibertarian age” (Mbembe 2021)? How does the transformation of European borders into “deathscapes” rely on a logic of securitization and immunization supported by digital infrastructures of control and racialized surveillance (Pugliese 2022; Stümer 2018; Browne 2015)?

In conversation with cybernetics, Sylvia Wynter reminds us that the Foucauldian framework around security requires further elaboration to confront how the category of “Man” has historically depended on racialized life and the enduring histories of plantation economy, colonialism, and chattel slavery (Wynter 2003 & 2018; Foucault 2007; Tsing 2021). Articulations of territory, anxieties around health, cleanliness and contagion, and regimes of information and datafication intersect, and give rise to an assemblage in which differentially racialized, gendered, classified, and categorized human and non-human figures emerge (Weheliye 2014; Gossett & Hayward 2020). In response to this assemblage that exists at the center of contemporary political, cultural, and social subjection and abjection, we invite paper proposals reflecting on the relationship between contagion, information, and territoriality.

Responses might encompass, but are not limited to:

  • Metaphors of disease in relation to data and territoriality.
  • Neoliberal governmentality, borders, and racialized data.
  • Technologies and models of preemption, prediction, and inoculation.
  • Necropolitics, data, and immunity in its territorial and biomedical inflections.
  • Cultural imaginaries and histories of technologized futures and territories.
  • War, occupation, and apartheid in relation to information, territory, and contagion.
  • Debility and debilitation as endemic biopolitical strategies.
  • Insurance, financialized capital, and techno-libertarianism.
  • Infection and contagion in relation to BIPOC, queer, and trans* stigmatization and movement.
  • Biosecurity, border regimes, and the management of virality (HIV/AIDS, bird flu, BSE, Zika, etc.)

We welcome submissions on these themes across fields and disciplines. Please submit abstracts for 20-minute presentations of 250 to 300 words, along with brief biographical notes (about 50 words) to contagious.territories@hum.leidenuniv.nl by January 31, 2026. We especially encourage queer, BIPOC, disabled, working class, and other marginalized scholars to apply. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by February 28, 2026. Please note that attendance at this conference will be inperson ONLY. For more information, please contact us at contagious.territories@hum.leidenuniv.nl.